This past week in lab we tested our first truss
prototype. Melissa and I had toyed with
the bridge design for some time before deciding on a simple design that
consisted of one through truss with X’s in elevation and horizontal members in
plan view. We felt that, although rough, we would see how the bridge performed
to determine our next steps in design. Our initial plan was to focus on keeping
the cost low, however we found that the weight supported did not exceed
expectations as we hoped. Therefore, last minute alterations were made. Right
before testing, we added a deck truss that followed our gusset pattern and
included X’s on the outer plates, to prevent the bridge from failing from
middle compression. The reason for this addition, from conclusion of trial and
error, was that the weight needed to be dispersed to the outer edges. Although
our theory succeeded in testing, our results were not impressive. Our final
bridge cost $320,000 and supported 19 pounds.
Ultimately, our bridge failed at an outer gusset point, which was
disappointing because much of our design was contingent upon the success of our
gussets.
For this week, our team needs to analyze our bridge designs
through testing with thorough tension and compression measurements in order to
modify and refine our final product. WPBD was a great tool because it provided
us with those calculations, which allowed us to make modifications that
affected both cost and strength efficiency.
Chelsea Moss
No comments:
Post a Comment